ВХОД ДЛЯ ПАЦИЕНТОВ
вверх
поиск
админ
главная
исходное
последующие
|
Re: Перелом "около пластинки"
послал Tom DeCoster 05 Январь 2004, 15:19
|
All good and cogent arguments for antegrade nailing.
Regarding knee motion:
Knee motion is slower to return after retrograde nailing as you mention, but does come back after a few months just like or better than other knee operations (e.g., ACL reconstruction). Hip motion (that you didn't mention) returns to normal faster and more completely with retrograde nailing than antegrade.
Hence the concept of "entry site problems are probably equivalent."
Regarding distal fixation. I think the retrograde nail has better distal fixation because it is typically placed under direct control more distally in the distal fragment with potential for nail in the subchondral bone. The distal screws (3 or more) can be placed obliquely in several planes with nail mounted guides giving better purchase on the distal fragment than the typical co-linear transverse screws (often 2 or maybe 3). The clustered oblique screws seem better at resisting toggling of the voluminous distal fragment around the nail better than the co-linear screws, (which were designed for and work great for rotation and length control of mid-diaphyseal fractures).
But that is theory and you can achieve many of the desired effects with antegrade technique by driving the nail very distally as in the case shown and using a nail with very distal locking screws, as you mentioned and illustrated.
That's what makes this case an interesting discussion.
TD
|
Послать ответ |
Обратите внимание: Поля с жирными названиями обязательны.
Старайтесь отвечать в рамках обсуждаемой темы, а не начинать новые обсуждения.
Указывайте адекватную тему сообщения, чтобы было ясно, о чем оно.
Не послайте сообщений не по теме (оффтопик), раздраженных, грубых или обидных комментариев. Здесь это неуместно.
|