вверх  отправить  поиск  админ  главная  Предыдущее	Re: Анте- или ретроградно? Chris Wilson 26 Август 2003, 01:37 Having used a lot of both,I definitely vote for antegrade nail. You don't needlessly breach a joint, there are more size choices, distal locking is easier (the "distal" screws in a long retrograde nail being in the A/P orientation) and exchange nailing and reaming are easier. In view of the segmental fragments a case could be made for unreamed antegrade nail, with a view to exchange nailing if there is delayed union. Regards Chris Wilson Orthopaedic Surgeon University Hospital Cardiff UK	Сообщения о Ортопедия и травматология Также Chris Wilson Связаться с автором
	Ответить Re: Анте- или ретроградно? Alexander Chelnokov 26 Август 2003, 02:26 THX for your comments. The nail is to be the same anyway - a UFN-like solid one. It can be inserted both ways, can't it? i also don't like to touch an intact joint. But reduction here looks easier with retrograde insertion so i expected maybe the approach is now strongly advocated... :-) [ Ответить ] ( Ответить )

	Посетитель:

	"По форме правильно, а по существу - издевательство" В.И.Ленин
©2001-2019Orthoforum Coordinator.

[ Главная | Отправить сообщение | Поиск | Админ ]