ВХОД ДЛЯ ПАЦИЕНТОВ
вверх
поиск
админ
главная
исходное
последующие
|
Re: Ilizarov vs Orthofix
послал Myles Clough 26 Апрель 2006, 00:43
|
I've never used it but have seen the results and I think the concept is most intriguing. The disadvantage is the expense but US hospitals throw away these devices after use on one patient, so there must be a mechanism for distributing them to where they are needed.
You apply the frame then take an Xray, measure the remaining deformities, angulation, translation, rotation and shortening etc. Then feed these parameters into a computer program (on line) and it returns the adjustments that must be made to each of the 6 expansion devices. I hope Smith and Nephew will forgive my copying the image from their page

This is copied from http://ortho.smith-nephew.com/ca_en/Standard.asp?NodeId=2945 which has surprisingly little further information
The literature on this device is quite extensive now. A PubMed search for "Taylor spatial frame" yields 15 articles 12 of which are on subject. The full URL is
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=PureSearch&db=pubmed&details_term=taylor%5BAll%20Fields%5D%20AND%20spatial%5BAll%20Fields%5D%20AND%20frame%5BAll%20Fields%5D
Myles Clough mylesclough@shaw.ca
Orthopaedic Surgeon, Kamloops, BC, Canada
Clinical Instructor, University of British Columbia
Editor, OWL (Orthopaedic Web Links) http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com
Orthogate Workshop Pages http://www.orthogate.com/clough/index.htm
|
Послать ответ |
Обратите внимание: Поля с жирными названиями обязательны.
Старайтесь отвечать в рамках обсуждаемой темы, а не начинать новые обсуждения.
Указывайте адекватную тему сообщения, чтобы было ясно, о чем оно.
Не послайте сообщений не по теме (оффтопик), раздраженных, грубых или обидных комментариев. Здесь это неуместно.
|