Ответить
|
Re: infected wound problem
Alexander Chelnokov 11 Апрель 2007, 13:08
|
> The author does not disclose what he is up to, but there is nothing wrong
in
> his "revisionism"
Состав "волшебного снадобья" нашел И.Кучерявый, там причудливая смесь известных компонентов.
> I will be happy to have his address
Внезапные решения крупных проблем, которые делаются чудаками-одиночками, этапы работы которых не публикуются в профильных журналах, о них неизвестно профессиональной аудитории - это сегодня 100% hoax.
|
[
Ответить ]
|
Re: infected wound problem
Отправитель: Aharon Liberson 11 Апрель 2007, 13:09
|
I would agree generally
The only thing is that I myself agree with the author that we are in disadvantage in treating the infected cavity itself and adjuscent compromised tissues. And I do use some of new vacuum, US, Waterjet technigues as well as hyperbaric oxygen. I even once wrote an article of streptokinase application.
We all (doctors)could do better then giving iv antibiotics and operating, sometimes too bravely for amputation.
This is why I myself do listen before judging-be sure T. Edison got a lot of criticism before he launched his projects. I would like all interested people 2 express themselves-sometimes being a representative of "the institutuion" closes our eyes for good ideas. Lets hear him
AL
|
[
Ответить ]
|
|
( Ответить )
|
|
